Legal · GC + Law Firm

Audit trails counsel can defend.

The Act's enforcement teeth bite when the evidence is thin. Veritome produces the artefacts you'd hand to a regulator, an auditor or a deposition team — every record timestamped, every dossier hash-sealed, every change attributable to the user who made it.

See the regulator-view dossierTalk to us

No credit card · EU-hosted · 5-min

Three asks legal teams have on us

Defensibility under three different lights.

Client says they're 'mostly compliant'. Show me what they actually have.

The regulator-view dossier is a single PDF per system: classification record, obligation status, evidence per item, hash chain. No screenshots, no slide decks.

M&A target's AI estate is a black box. We need a diligence summary in 48 hours.

Public verify URL on every dossier. Diligence team reads the seal directly — no NDA gymnastics on portal access, no redacted screenshots.

If we get an Art. 99 information request, can we produce the evidence inside the deadline?

Every mutation is in the audit log with user, timestamp and before/after. Every dossier entry has its own serial number. The chain is tamper-evident — a break is surfaced, not hidden.
What changes for counsel

Built for the conversation that starts 'show me'.

Tamper-evident audit trail

Dossier entries form a hash chain; verifyDossierChain surfaces breaks rather than swallowing them. The integrity property is the audit artefact.

Regulator-view dossier

A separate PDF rendering with marginalia article references and Fraunces display type. Designed to read as authoritative on a regulator's desk.

Public verify URL

verify.veritome.eu/d/<id> — anyone can check the seal without an account. M&A diligence, regulator handoffs, customer due diligence all use the same mechanism.

Per-action audit log

Every mutation logged: classification change, obligation status flip, evidence upload, dossier-entry submission. User, timestamp, before/after — exhaustive.

Multi-client RBAC (firms)

Law firms manage multiple client orgs from one account; permissions enforced at the API. Conflicts walls per-engagement, not global.

Article-anchored everything

Every screen carries the article reference. Deposition prep doesn't need a translation step — the system speaks the same language as the regulation.

In practice

Three legal contexts, one source of truth.

USE CASE 01

A boutique law firm advising 50 SME clients on AI Act readiness.

  • Multi-client architecture — one firm account, fifty client orgs.
  • Standardised playbook: readiness check → classification → obligation map → evidence collection per client.
  • The regulator-view dossier is the deliverable; clients receive it as a PDF + verify URL.
  • Audit-trail recovery if a regulator request lands at one client; the chain reads start-to-end.
Veritome Annex IV technical-file builder — eleven sections assembled from live system data with a hash-sealed export
USE CASE 02

M&A diligence team examining an AI-native target's compliance posture.

  • Target hands over a verify URL; diligence team reads the seal without portal access or NDA blockers.
  • Hash chain confirms integrity — no quiet edits during the diligence window.
  • Per-system dossier exposes classification reasoning, obligation status, evidence completeness.
  • Findings feed straight into the rep-and-warranty schedule.
Veritome Annex IV technical-file builder — eleven sections assembled from live system data with a hash-sealed export
USE CASE 03

In-house GC fielding an Art. 99 information request from a national authority.

  • Audit log shows every action on the named system across the inspection window.
  • Dossier entries (Art. 6 self-exclusion, Art. 6(4) authority notification, conformity assessment, IFU handoff) numbered and hashed.
  • Phase-gate attestations record exactly when each phase passed 100% — not 'around April'.
  • Response pack assembles in a working day, not three weeks.
Veritome Annex IV technical-file builder — eleven sections assembled from live system data with a hash-sealed export
What counsel leans on

The capabilities that hold up in evidence.